Requirements
SIGN-UP DEADLINE: March 20th, 5:00. Late sign-up will NOT be accepted.
SUBMISSION DEDALINE: March 21st, 3:30. Late entries will NOT be accepted.
Prizes
$2,000 in prizes
1st Place
1st Place
$1,000 in cash
1 winner
2nd Place
2nd Place
$500 in cash
1 winner
3rd Place
3rd Place
$250 in cash
1 winner
3rd Place
3rd Place
$250 in cash
1 winner
Devpost Achievements
Submitting to this hackathon could earn you:
Judges
Tekton Representative
TEKTON
Victor T. Norman
Calvin University
Christopher Wieringa
Calvin University
Judging Criteria
-
1. Connection to Theme: Thematic Alignment - 10%
How intentionally does the project integrate faith and technology? Is the connection thoughtful and genuine, or superficial? -
1. Connection to Theme: Ethical Design - 10%
Did the team think through the ethical implications of their tech choices? e.g. privacy, bias, accessibility, or unintended harm. Are their decisions guided by a values-driven framework? -
2. Project Idea: Real-World Application - 10%
Does the project solve a genuine problem or fill a real need? Would someone actually use this? (e.g. everyday tools, quality-of-life improvements, ministry aids -
2. Project Idea: Creativity & Originality - 10%
Is the concept fresh or inventive? Does it go beyond generic or obvious implementations? Does it surprise or delight? -
3. Technical Depth: Tools & Libraries - 10%
Did the team leverage appropriate frameworks, APIs, or libraries? Are the choices well-suited to the problem they set out to solve? -
3. Technical Depth: Tech Stack Diversity - 10%
Did the project integrate multiple technologies or systems meaningfully? Is there evidence of deliberate architectural thinking? -
4. Design & Thoughtfulness: UI/UX - 10%
Was thought put into how users interact with the project? Does the interface feel intentional? -
4. Design & Thoughtfulness: Presentation and Product - 10%
Can the team articulate what their project is and where the project is going? Does the design reflect forward-thinking? -
5. Execution & Understanding: Project Completeness - 10%
How much of the intended project is functional? Partial but solid work is valued. Judge what exists and the potential of what's presented. -
5. Execution & Understanding: Code Comprehension - 10%
During the Q&A, can team members explain how their code works at a conceptual level? Do they understand the decisions made, AI-assisted or otherwise?
Questions? Email the hackathon manager
Tell your friends
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.


